Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Chenery Applied to Agency Reconsideration Denials: Agencies Cannot Swap “Ineligibility” for Merits-Based Rationales in Litigation

Chenery Applied to Agency Reconsideration Denials: Agencies Cannot Swap “Ineligibility” for Merits-Based Rationales in Litigation

Date: Jan 19, 2026
Chenery Applied to Agency Reconsideration Denials: Agencies Cannot Swap “Ineligibility” for Merits-Based Rationales in Litigation 1. Introduction In Doe v. HHS (5th Cir. Jan. 16, 2026), Dr. John...
Genesis Marine v. Darrow — Written-Notice Trigger for Limitation: Severity Allegations and Developing Records Can Start the Six-Month Clock (Settlement Demand Not Required)

Genesis Marine v. Darrow — Written-Notice Trigger for Limitation: Severity Allegations and Developing Records Can Start the Six-Month Clock (Settlement Demand Not Required)

Date: Jan 19, 2026
Genesis Marine v. Darrow — Written-Notice Trigger for Limitation: Severity Allegations and Developing Records Can Start the Six-Month Clock (Settlement Demand Not Required) Court: U.S. Court of...
“Limited Partner” in § 1402(a)(13) Means Limited Liability Status, Not Passive-Investor Function

“Limited Partner” in § 1402(a)(13) Means Limited Liability Status, Not Passive-Investor Function

Date: Jan 18, 2026
“Limited Partner” in § 1402(a)(13) Means Limited Liability Status, Not Passive-Investor Function I. Introduction In Sirius Solutions, L.L.L.P. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (5th Cir. Jan. 16,...
Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement Can Preserve Rule 59(e) Timing, While Limitations Defenses May Defeat Pro Se Employment Claims on Rule 12(b)(6)

Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement Can Preserve Rule 59(e) Timing, While Limitations Defenses May Defeat Pro Se Employment Claims on Rule 12(b)(6)

Date: Jan 18, 2026
Rule 58’s Separate-Document Requirement Can Preserve Rule 59(e) Timing, While Limitations Defenses May Defeat Pro Se Employment Claims on Rule 12(b)(6) I. Introduction In Carmon v. Clean Harbors Deer...
Superseded-Pleading Admissions May Establish LLC Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction; Conclusory Market Definitions and Competitor Harm Do Not State Sherman Act Claims

Superseded-Pleading Admissions May Establish LLC Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction; Conclusory Market Definitions and Competitor Harm Do Not State Sherman Act Claims

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Superseded-Pleading Admissions May Establish LLC Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction; Conclusory Market Definitions and Competitor Harm Do Not State Sherman Act Claims I. Introduction In Rx...
USCIS Denial of Affirmative Asylum for TPS Beneficiaries Is Not “Final Agency Action” Under the APA; Review Must Await Removal Proceedings

USCIS Denial of Affirmative Asylum for TPS Beneficiaries Is Not “Final Agency Action” Under the APA; Review Must Await Removal Proceedings

Date: Jan 17, 2026
USCIS Denial of Affirmative Asylum for TPS Beneficiaries Is Not “Final Agency Action” Under the APA; Review Must Await Removal Proceedings Case: Maribel Sayegh de Kewayfati v. Pamela Bondi, et al....
USCIS Denial of Affirmative Asylum to TPS Holders Is Not “Final Agency Action” Reviewable Under the APA; Finality Is Jurisdictional in the Fifth Circuit

USCIS Denial of Affirmative Asylum to TPS Holders Is Not “Final Agency Action” Reviewable Under the APA; Finality Is Jurisdictional in the Fifth Circuit

Date: Jan 17, 2026
USCIS Denial of Affirmative Asylum to TPS Holders Is Not “Final Agency Action” Reviewable Under the APA; Finality Is Jurisdictional in the Fifth Circuit Case: Sayegh de Kewayfati v. Bondi Court:...
Valuing Litigation Claims at $0 in Chapter 11 Triggers Judicial Estoppel Against Later Pursuit of Substantial Damages

Valuing Litigation Claims at $0 in Chapter 11 Triggers Judicial Estoppel Against Later Pursuit of Substantial Damages

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Valuing Litigation Claims at $0 in Chapter 11 Triggers Judicial Estoppel Against Later Pursuit of Substantial Damages Introduction In Royal American Construction, Incorporated v. Roofing Designs by...
RICO Mail-Fraud Claims Do Not Require Reliance, and Settlements Do Not Automatically Break Proximate Causation

RICO Mail-Fraud Claims Do Not Require Reliance, and Settlements Do Not Automatically Break Proximate Causation

Date: Jan 17, 2026
RICO Mail-Fraud Claims Do Not Require Reliance, and Settlements Do Not Automatically Break Proximate Causation Introduction In Allstate Indem Co v. Bhagat (5th Cir. Jan. 14, 2026), Allstate sued...
CAT “Specific Intent” and Speculative Risk: Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Deferral Based on Salvadoran Prison Conditions and Past Police Abuse

CAT “Specific Intent” and Speculative Risk: Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Deferral Based on Salvadoran Prison Conditions and Past Police Abuse

Date: Jan 17, 2026
CAT “Specific Intent” and Speculative Risk: Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Deferral Based on Salvadoran Prison Conditions and Past Police Abuse Case: Fuentes-Pineda v. Bondi (5th Cir. Jan. 14, 2026)...
Texas SIP Construction-Deadline Extensions: 30 Tex. Admin. Code § 116.120(c) Requires Only Prior Litigation-Based Extension + 10% Expenditure; Chapter 50 Procedures Do Not Apply

Texas SIP Construction-Deadline Extensions: 30 Tex. Admin. Code § 116.120(c) Requires Only Prior Litigation-Based Extension + 10% Expenditure; Chapter 50 Procedures Do Not Apply

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Texas SIP Construction-Deadline Extensions: 30 Tex. Admin. Code § 116.120(c) Requires Only Prior Litigation-Based Extension + 10% Expenditure; Chapter 50 Procedures Do Not Apply Case: South Texas...
United States v. Dubois — Article III Prohibits Delegating the Inpatient/Outpatient Treatment Choice to Probation After a Short Revocation Sentence

United States v. Dubois — Article III Prohibits Delegating the Inpatient/Outpatient Treatment Choice to Probation After a Short Revocation Sentence

Date: Jan 17, 2026
United States v. Dubois — Article III Prohibits Delegating the Inpatient/Outpatient Treatment Choice to Probation After a Short Revocation Sentence Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Channel-Restricted Antitrust Markets Fail Without Evidence of Non-Substitutability; Rebate “Lock-In” Alone Cannot Create a Single-Brand Market

Channel-Restricted Antitrust Markets Fail Without Evidence of Non-Substitutability; Rebate “Lock-In” Alone Cannot Create a Single-Brand Market

Date: Jan 17, 2026
Channel-Restricted Antitrust Markets Fail Without Evidence of Non-Substitutability; Rebate “Lock-In” Alone Cannot Create a Single-Brand Market Case: Endure Industries v. Vizient (5th Cir. Jan. 13,...
ADE A Retaliation Requires Age-Related Complaints; Title VII Pretext Assessed Under the “Clearly Better Qualified” Standard (Not “Jump Off the Page”)

ADE A Retaliation Requires Age-Related Complaints; Title VII Pretext Assessed Under the “Clearly Better Qualified” Standard (Not “Jump Off the Page”)

Date: Jan 15, 2026
ADEA Retaliation Requires Age-Related Complaints; Title VII Pretext Assessed Under the “Clearly Better Qualified” Standard (Not “Jump Off the Page”) I. Introduction In Awe v. Harris Health System...
Worldwide Reversion on U.S. Termination and 1909 Renewal: “Arise Under This Title” Has No Geographic Limit

Worldwide Reversion on U.S. Termination and 1909 Renewal: “Arise Under This Title” Has No Geographic Limit

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Worldwide Reversion on U.S. Termination and 1909 Renewal: “Arise Under This Title” Has No Geographic Limit Case: Vetter v. Resnik (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 2026) — Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit New...
Revocation Sentencing and “Bare” Arrest Records: Error Exists, but Relief Requires Dominance and Plain-Error Prejudice

Revocation Sentencing and “Bare” Arrest Records: Error Exists, but Relief Requires Dominance and Plain-Error Prejudice

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Revocation Sentencing and “Bare” Arrest Records: Error Exists, but Relief Requires Dominance and Plain-Error Prejudice Introduction In United States v. Smith (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 2026) (unpublished),...
Coercive Control Over a Minor’s Production and Sending of Child Sexual Abuse Material Constitutes “Distribution” Under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1(b)(3)

Coercive Control Over a Minor’s Production and Sending of Child Sexual Abuse Material Constitutes “Distribution” Under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1(b)(3)

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Coercive Control Over a Minor’s Production and Sending of Child Sexual Abuse Material Constitutes “Distribution” Under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1(b)(3) Case: United States v. Lowe (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 2026)...
Bruen Does Not Abrogate Hollis: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(o)’s Machinegun Ban and Upholds Second-Degree-Murder Cross-Reference Under Plain-Error Review

Bruen Does Not Abrogate Hollis: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(o)’s Machinegun Ban and Upholds Second-Degree-Murder Cross-Reference Under Plain-Error Review

Date: Jan 14, 2026
Bruen Does Not Abrogate Hollis: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms § 922(o)’s Machinegun Ban and Upholds Second-Degree-Murder Cross-Reference Under Plain-Error Review Case: United States v. Wilson (5th Cir....
Younger Abstention Applies to Pennsylvania Usury Enforcement OSCs; Appellate Courts May Affirm Despite Omitted Sprint Threshold Finding When Record Satisfies It

Younger Abstention Applies to Pennsylvania Usury Enforcement OSCs; Appellate Courts May Affirm Despite Omitted Sprint Threshold Finding When Record Satisfies It

Date: Jan 12, 2026
Younger Abstention Applies to Pennsylvania Usury Enforcement OSCs; Appellate Courts May Affirm Despite Omitted Sprint Threshold Finding When Record Satisfies It 1. Introduction In TMX Finance...
Phillips v. Enterprise Products: “Fishing-Expedition” Evidence and Disputed Discipline Can Create a Jury Question on Retaliatory Pretext (Cat’s Paw) at Summary Judgment

Phillips v. Enterprise Products: “Fishing-Expedition” Evidence and Disputed Discipline Can Create a Jury Question on Retaliatory Pretext (Cat’s Paw) at Summary Judgment

Date: Jan 12, 2026
“Fishing-Expedition” Evidence and Disputed Discipline Can Create a Jury Question on Retaliatory Pretext (Cat’s Paw) at Summary Judgment I. Introduction In Phillips v. Enterprise Products Company (5th...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert